When entering marriage, we anticipate unwavering support from our spouse, regardless of financial circumstances. Yet, reality can defy these hopes, and true character surfaces in times of hardship. Such was the case for our protagonist today, who learned her husband sought to exploit her wealth for personal gain. However, fate intervened, leaving him without the riches he sought.
Sarah, 37, penned a heartfelt letter to us, opening with a poignant backstory. She revealed that her father had recently passed away, leaving her in profound mourning. Their bond was unparalleled, especially since he had raised her single-handedly following the tragic loss of her mother when Sarah was just a child.
Sarah disclosed that her father was a highly accomplished lawyer, renowned within legal circles and beyond. His prowess in the courtroom was legendary, earning him widespread recognition and admiration. Often dubbed as “a wizard” or “a genius” by his peers, he had a remarkable ability to secure victories in cases deemed insurmountable by even the most seasoned professionals. Many looked up to him as a mentor, learning invaluable lessons from his expertise and finesse.
Given his exceptional skill, it’s unsurprising that Sarah’s father amassed considerable wealth. With a net worth nearing a billion dollars, he held ownership of multiple prominent law firms, extensive property holdings, and a luxurious collection of cars.
As a single father, Sarah’s dad dedicated himself to instilling his core values in his daughter. One pivotal lesson was his philosophy on finances. Sarah recalled how he taught her the importance of modesty and frugality. Despite their abundance, she grew up understanding the significance of not ostentatiously displaying their privileged position.
Sarah revealed, “I went to an ordinary school and later entered a law faculty, all without my dad’s interference. He wouldn’t even help me prepare for my entrance exams, insisting that I should follow his path and work my way up from the bottom without skipping any steps.”
Upon graduating with honors and landing a position at a small law firm, Sarah’s father beamed with pride at her accomplishments. Despite having the means to offer her a job at one of his larger companies, he steadfastly refused, emphasizing the importance of her forging her own path to success.
Sarah explained, “Even though my dad was a very famous figure, I never appeared in the media with him. His impeccable reputation and talent were his alone, and I never objected. I understood his reasoning. He wanted to ensure that after he was gone, my future would depend on me, not on his legacy or wealth.”
As Sarah started seeing Bradd, a fellow university student, her father approached the situation with skepticism. In their first encounter, he peppered Bradd with questions, sensing a mismatch in what he called his “personal check.”
Sarah recalls, “My dad always warned me that Bradd was a lazy, entitled individual who was drawn to my father’s fame and wealth from the start. But I chalked it up to my father’s protective nature, appreciating it but not giving much weight to his concerns about Bradd.”
Bradd, for his part, never broached any topics related to money when conversing with Sarah, further convincing her of his pure intentions. They tied the knot a year before her father’s passing, and their marriage appeared blissful both personally and professionally, as they both pursued their careers with zeal and enjoyment.
Following the loss of her father, Sarah was consumed by profound sorrow. Yet, she was surprised by Bradd’s behavior in such trying circumstances. Sarah remembered, “Instead of offering comfort and support during my overwhelming sorrow, Bradd immediately broached the subject of my inheritance, asking about the extent of my expected wealth after my father’s demise.”
This question shocked her, triggering memories of her father’s warnings about Bradd’s true intentions and how he was only interested in her for her father’s money.
Sarah disclosed, “When he asked about my inheritance, my expression must have betrayed my surprise. I responded, ’What inheritance? I won’t receive a dime from my dad. I’m not even mentioned in his will.’”
Bradd brushed it off as a joke or a result of her distress after the funeral, assuming she was talking nonsensically. Sarah countered, “There’s no inheritance for me because I’m not my dad’s biological daughter. I was adopted a year before my mom’s death, and although my dad raised me as his own, he never intended to include me in his will. I’ve known this my entire life.”
In Sarah’s ongoing narrative, she discloses that Bradd initiated divorce proceedings merely a month after discovering her lack of inheritance from her father. Subsequently, Sarah arranged a meeting with Bradd, facilitated by a family friend who had been her father’s business associate.
At the dinner, Sarah’s father’s partner unveiled her father’s will to Bradd. It outlined a provision stating that if Bradd remained married to Sarah for five years following her father’s passing, he would be entitled to half of the estate, while the remaining half would go to Sarah. However, in the event of a divorce, Sarah was designated as the sole beneficiary of her father’s entire fortune and properties.
In her concluding words, Sarah expressed her contentment, remarking, “It was immensely gratifying to witness my ex’s shocked reaction. His face turned pale, then red, then pale again. He was left speechless, like a fish gasping for air out of water. I felt that my father’s plan had been fully realized, and he could finally rest in peace, knowing that I was thriving without that ’lazy, spoiled kid’ in my life.”
In another tale of family drama, the woman revealed that her husband had married her solely for her wealth. However, after her father’s passing, he received his just deserts.
